Please share with your networks!
From: Sumter, Kyler <KSumter@nrdc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 10:12 AM
To: Kelly, Margie <mkelly@nrdc.org>
Subject: “Staggering” Health Benefits From Replacing Lead Water Pipes Could Save Nearly $1 Trillion from Avoided Health Impacts
Good morning all, this release on our health benefits study went out to reporters earlier today:
https://www.nrdc.org/press-releases/staggering-health-benefits-replacing-lead-water-pipes-could-save-nearly-1-trillion
BCC: Media; Press Release Core; Comms Breaking News; Safe Water Initiative; Water
For Immediate Release
Contact: Margie Kelly, NRDC,
mkelly@nrdc.org, 541-222-9699
“Staggering” Health Benefits From Replacing Lead Water Pipes Could Save Nearly $1 Trillion from Avoided Health Impacts
Removing lead pipes will bring massive savings in public health costs - nearly 90% due to links between lead exposure and cardiovascular disease, new state-by-state analysis finds
WASHINGTON (October 25, 2023) – Replacing every lead pipe that delivers drinking water to homes nationwide would yield hundreds of billions of dollars in avoided health costs, according to a
new state-by-state analysis released today from NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). “Getting
the Lead Out” finds that every state would reap enormous savings in avoided health costs – with nearly 90% of the savings coming from reduced cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in the U.S.
“Decades ago, health risks led to a ban on lead from gasoline and paint, but lead remains widespread in drinking water across the nation. This is an urgent public health crisis, as tens of millions
of people essentially drink water from a lead straw, unaware of the big risk to their health,” said
Erik
D. Olson, NRDC’s senior strategic director for health, who authored the report. “We found staggering health and dollar benefits for removing lead water pipes. And water utilities that do nothing are essentially opting in
favor of avoidable and costly health risks and even deaths.”
Federal rules for tap water adopted by the Trump Administration in 2021 failed to consider these enormous public health benefits. However, with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) poised
to release a new rule regulating lead in drinking water in a few weeks, the agency is expected to require that all lead drinking water pipes be fully replaced.
Health experts agree there is no safe level of exposure to lead. In addition to long-known risks, such as damage to children’s brains and certain cancers, the American Heart Association recently
issued a formal Scientific
Statement emphasizing there is significant evidence that exposure to lead is linked to numerous cardiovascular diseases, including stroke and heart attack. The risk of heart disease is especially high in populations
of color and low socioeconomic means, due in part to greater lead exposure.
“No amount of lead is safe. Most people know children’s brains are vulnerable to this toxic metal, but lead is also a striking risk factor for fatal heart disease in adults. Lead pipes are a
major source of lead in drinking water, so states and cities must urgently replace them,” said
Bruce P. Lanphear, MD, MPH, Professor of Children’s Environmental Health, Simon Fraser University. Dr. Lanphear has conducted research on the sources of lead exposure and the health impacts of lead poisoning for over 25 years.
The benefits of removing lead service lines, the lead pipes that connect homes to the water mains in the street, dwarf the costs by an enormous margin. NRDC’s analysis determined the benefits
of removing lead pipes outweigh the costs by 14- to 17-fold. EPA and the water utility trade association in the past have estimated the total cost of removing all 9.2 million lead service lines nationwide would be in the range of $46 to $56 billion.
The total health savings of reducing lead levels in tap water would be orders of magnitude higher, according to a recent
Harvard
T.H. Chan School of Public Health study,
which formed much of the basis for the NRDC study. Ronnie Levin, the lead co-author of the Harvard study, extracted data on the benefits of removing lead pipes from that study, and based upon that analysis forecast
at least $9 billion in annual health benefits from removing all lead pipes in the country, with total health savings of $786 billion over the next 35 years.
“Lead can seriously harm our health and kids are especially vulnerable. But the study released today highlights that adults are at risk too, and that the health and economic benefits of removing
lead pipes would be significant, many times what it would cost to pull them out. It may surprise many people that about 90 percent of the quantifiable health costs from lead released by lead service lines is due to its link to cardiovascular disease and death.
We can fix this problem, we just need the will to do it,” said
Ronnie Levin, lead co-author of the Harvard study and instructor
at the T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
The financial benefits in avoided health costs
in each state are enormous. Benefits for individual states based on NRDC estimates of lead service lines range from $325 million for Alaska on the low end to $58 billion in Illinois on the high end.
Top States: Total Benefits and Costs of Full Lead Service Line Replacement*
1. Illinois |
$58B |
to $89B |
2. Ohio |
$56B |
to $64B |
3. Michigan |
$39B |
to $26B |
4. New York |
$31B |
to $42B |
5. New Jersey |
$30B |
to $29B |
6. Missouri |
$28B |
to $17B |
7. Wisconsin |
$28B
|
to $29B |
8. Indiana |
$25B |
to $23B |
9. Texas |
$23B |
to $55B |
10. Minnesota |
$22B |
to $23B |
11. Florida |
$17B |
to $99B |
12. Pennsylvania |
$14B |
to $59B |
* Total Estimated Benefits over 35-year Analysis Period to closest billion dollars (USD); based on NRDC and EPA estimates of the number of lead service lines (LSLs). Ranking based on
NRDC estimates; EPA’s estimates for certain states, particularly FL, have been questioned–see report for full details.
NRDC recommendations include:
METHODOLOGY:
NRDC’s report, “Getting
the Lead Out,” builds on a Harvard School of Public Health study that sought to quantify and monetize the full range of health benefits of reducing lead levels in drinking water. Other data points used
to develop the state-by-state health benefits analysis were taken from
EPA’s recent state survey
and
NRDC’s 50-state survey identifying the number of lead pipes in each state.
The Harvard study was published in July 2023 in the peer-reviewed scientific journal
Environmental Research
by Harvard researchers Ronnie Levin and Joel Schwartz. The authors are recognized lead experts who were formerly involved in developing EPA’s estimates of the health benefits of reducing lead exposure.
The Harvard analysis shows that the EPA’s January 2021 proposed plan to regulate lead in drinking water during the Trump Administration failed to consider the vast majority of the $9.2 billion
in annual health benefits that EPA’s published scientific assessments found are caused by lead exposure. The study found the EPA had “developed a highly detailed and comprehensive cost analysis while ignoring 95 percent of the health effects it has
determined are causally related to lead exposure.” The study noted the EPA’s 2021 analysis of the economic costs of addressing lead in water is 359 pages long while the discussion of health benefits totals 56 pages.
###
NRDC (Natural
Resources Defense Council) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 3 million members and online activists. Established in 1970, NRDC uses science, policy, law and people power to confront
the climate crisis, protect public health and safeguard nature. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Bozeman, MT, Beijing and Dehli (an office of NRDC India Pvt. Ltd). Visit us at
www.nrdc.org
and follow us on Twitter @NRDC.
KYLER SUMTER
Senior Media Assistant
(SHE/HER)
NATURAL RESOURCES
DEFENSE COUNCIL
20 n. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 1600
CHICAGO, IL 60606
M 773.450.5943
KSUMTER@NRDC.ORG
NRDC.ORG